We Care. We Listen.
We Achieve Results.
Lawyers
The Lawyers They Tried to Silence and Erase.
The Odtojan Bryl Justice Project (OBJP) was born from the grave injustice inflicted on Sydney lawyers Marie Odtojan and Artem Bryl, and their firm, Odtojan Bryl Lawyers (OBL). The Law Society of NSW unlawfully stripped them of their practising rights, without due process, without lawful determination, and without any breaches of law, conduct, or ethics.
With no proven case, two innocent lawyers with unblemished records and over 18 years of combined experience were rendered “unfit” to practise law, based on nothing more than their mere "views".
This is not the Rule of Law. Such unlawful actions have no place in a democratic country like Australia.
We will not be silenced. Our voices are amplified, our story recorded for the world to witness: the NSW legal regulators retaliated against us for acting lawfully, reporting misconduct and criminality since 2016, and seeking justice in the courts against Mr Nicholas Ford (Coram Chambers), Mr Thomas Glynn (Glynns Lawyers), and Senior Counsel Mr Miles Condon (New Chambers).
This is a public interest initiative. We call for reforms, the details of which will be set out on this website. Read our blogs, join our call to action, and stand with us.
How You Can Support
Sign the Petition:
Calling for the resignation of Attorney General Michael Daley and MP Hugh McDermott for condoning unlawful conduct and fabricating the false narrative of “alleged prior misconduct.”
Donate:
Support our legal cause and our call for reforms.
Note: This site is a work in progress. Updates, resources, and further details will be provided.
Ms Odtojan's Report on Piper Alderman 27 June 2018 to OLSC - Map of Participants
Over a decade of on-going alleged fraud/improprieties by Credit Corp and its lawyers, Mr Carlos Toda of Certus Partners / Piper Alderman, which pertain to alleged indictable offences, administration of justice offences, impersonation of legal practitioners, concealment of criminality/improprieties, corruption, circumvention and contravention of the national credit laws, court rules/processes, which stem from the alleged original act by St George Bank of its non-compliance with the credit laws where it failed to form a credit card contract and provided an unsolicited credit card. The unsolicited penalties alone attract approx. $2.5M under the ASIC Act, payable to the Commonwealth of Australia. This is just one case of many.
This is a public interest case and such notice is given for the protection of the public and the integrity of the courts and the legal profession. See the full notice ==> Public Notice.
The Law Society of NSW Professional Standards Department (PSD), the President & Law Council (15 members) incl. Former President Brett McGrath of Marsden Group, the Registry Office and the Office of Legal Services Commissioner (OLSC)/ NSW Legal Services Commissioner, Ms Samantha Gulliver, (collectively referred to as "LSNSW Members") are alleged, by design, engaged in a targeted discriminatory unlawful acts of tampering/preventing the legitimate renewals of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's Practising Certificates & Solicitors Memberships and had tampered/deleted the said solicitors records/data in the Law Society Registry of Solicitors database.
The LSNSW Members had done such acts against the said solicitors without any legal basis. There were no proceedings before NCAT nor any orders/determinations. Such acts were done by ambush.
The LSNSW Members are alleged to have fabricated 'misconduct' & 'findings of misconduct' against the said solicitors, where they are aware such misconduct does not exist and they cannot substantiate such serious allegations.
On 13 and 15 August 2024, 12 February 2025 and 15 May 2025, Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl gave notice to the LSNSW Members of the unlawful and corrupt conduct of unlawfully preventing the legitimate renewal of their practising certificates without any lawful basis and making unfounded statements of fact/allegations of misconduct against them where no such misconduct existed.
To date, the LSNSW Members have ignored and not responded to the notices given to them by Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl.
The LSNSW Members ignore Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl's requests to substantiate their legal basis, the jurisdiction and their serious allegation of misconduct they made against Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl. They have also ignored notices for each of them to self-report themselves as officers of LSNSW and legal practitioners engaging in improprieties and unlawful acts in office.
The LSNSW Members continue to rely on their unsubstantiated misconduct allegations against Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl, and show intent to do a targeted hate crime against the said practitioners, where they have stated that they will determine the said solicitors practising certificates based on the misconduct (which the LSNSW Members created), and will determine such matters and the fate of the said solicitors in their 'private meeting' between LSNSW Members.
LSNSW PSD/OLSC Cover-up of reports of improprieties, fraud and impersonation of lawyers for over a decade
It is alleged that the LSNSW PSD/OLSC offices have been used by the said officers of LSNSW Members to cover up and condone improprieties and criminality that has been reported by Ms Odtojan to LSNSW PSD/OLSC for over a decade. This is alleged to be their agenda to target Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl and their Law firm, who are also helping other victims of Credit Corp which Ms Odtojan was victim of in Odtojan ats Credit Corp in 2014-2016 proceedings.
Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl are victims/witnesses to the conduct reported to LSWNSW PSD and OLSC. This includes alleged judicial fraud done by of NSW Supreme Court Justices M. Leeming and J. Kirk (Condon SC leave to appeal case in 2023); Justices J. Basten and R. White (in Ford & Glynn leave to appeal case in 2023) Note: On 31 January 2025, Basten received Order of Australia award (AO) and resigned from his acting judge duties of the Supreme Court on 1 May 2025, and on 19 December 2024 White retired and now practices as a Senior Counsel at 7 Wentworth Selborne Chambers; District Court Judge S. Norton (interim hearing Feb 2023) and Magistrate S. Freund (Local Court Odtojan ats Credit Corp - the original fraud recording a credit contract exist based on a mere statement without any evidence before the Magistrate, and solely relied upon the mere statement of Mr Ford that a contract was only provided to his client on '12 January 2015' where no evidence supported such statement he consistently made before the court at the bar table.
Mr Nicolas Ford of Coram Chambers, Mr Thomas Glynn of Gylnn Lawyers and Mr Miles Condon SC of New
In the final hearing on 18 and 19 July 2016, Mr Ford & Mr Glynn ran a different case to their client's case (Ms Odtojan) where the client had always disputed the existence of a credit contract pleaded by Credit Corp. which it could not produce despite notices to produce and court orders for period 2015-2016.
Mr Ford and Mr Glynn eliminated such issue for Piper Alderman/Credit Corp by making unsubstantiated representations at the bar table that a contract exist and was provided to their client on '12 January 2015'.
At court, Mr Ford referred to Credit Corp's solicitor as his 'learned instructing solicitor Mr Florian Ammer', when Mr Thomas Glynn was his instructing solicitor whom Mr Ford insisted Ms Odtojan retained as instructing solicitor for the hearing.
Mr Glynn would disappear after the hearing. Ms Odtojan never saw him again. Mr Glynn with Mr Ford withheld court dates and court documents, preventing Ms Odtojan from responding to Credit Corp/Piper Alderman's affidavits/court documents.
Mr Sebastian Hartford Davis of Banco Chambers, counsel for Piper Alderman received a judgment in his favour without proving his cause of action under a contract which Credit Corp/Piper Alderman/Certus Partners have recorded in their statment of claim. Ms Hartford Davis never produced any contract nor referred to any terms of a contract to prove a breach of contract terms to prove his case. He had assisted his former Piper Alderman colleague, Ms Natalie Miller, to impersonate a solicitor, referring to her (a paralegal at the time) as his 'instructing solicitor' at the bar table.
Magistrate Freund allowed Ms Miller to tamper with evidence circling Ms Odtojan's signatures on multiple documents and she was allowed to hand up those documents as tendered evidence.
Magistrate Freund had framed up Odtojan Bryl Lawyers as the instructing solicitors when she had no such record /notice of appearance. This was also contrary to her hand-written court sheet which recorded 'T.Glynn' as instructing solicitor and 'N.Ford' as counsel. Magistrate Freund also recorded that the instructing solicitor for Credit Corp is 'Ms 'Anne Freeman' when it was Ms Natalie Miller impersonating a solicitor before her at the final hearing on 18 and 19 July 2016.
To date, no one can substantiate and provide any evidence of a Credit Contract which Magistrate Freund has recorded approx. 75 times in her judgment. This also include the Magistrate herself. Ms Odtojan asked her after the proceedings to refer and produce the contract she recorded in her judgment, which she also relied upon to give indemnity costs of more than $250,000 in the Local Court proceedings.
The Magistrate did not answer the request to substantiate and provide evidence of her recorded contract in her judgement, and directed Ms Odtojan to Mr Ford and Mr Glynn, whom to date has ignored such request for them to provide the evidence of a contract relied upon by Magistrate Freund.
To date, ongoing for 9 years, Mr Ford, Mr Glynn, and Mr Miles Condon SC has never produced the credit contract they recorded in their appeal advice and which Mr Ford stated, on record, in the Local Court proceedings, that his client received on '12 January 2015'.
In 2023, the said NSW Supreme Court Justices (above mentioned) made false records in their judgments of what transpired in the Local Court proceedings among other matters. They made representations on behalf of the respondents, Mr Ford, Mr Glynn, and Mr Condon SC, where the said three respondents never gave any evidence to support the said justices' records in their judgments.
The three respondents were never before any court hearing in relation to the Tort Damages case made against them by Ms Odtojan.
The judges made unsubstantiated statements in their judgements and made a referral of innocent persons (also victims/ witnesses of the alleged conduct recorded in Ms Odtojan's claim) to be investigated by the OLSC.
LSNSW PSD and OLSC had evidence of the said judges' false recordings in their respective judgments and have covered up their conduct and engaged in further acts of fraud against Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl, perpetuating the fraud committed by the said judges and those reported in Ms Odtojan's reports to OLSC/PSD.
For more info see 'Public Notice' below.
To Support & Donate to our Odtojan Bryl Justice Project visit: OBL_Linktree
Please use the hashtag #Justice4ArtemAndMarie when referring to this cause/case.
Important Credit Consumer Resources - Credit Laws.
Know your rights.
Do you know that all financial consumer credit products in Australia are subject to strict credit laws and you have rights under national credit laws:
NATIONAL CONSUMER CREDIT PROTECTION ACT 2009 (NCCP)
NATIONAL CONSUMER CREDIT CODE (NCC)
ASIC ACT 2001
What the banks, debt collectors, and their lawyers neither want you to know nor exercise.
This toolkit does not provide a guide in relation to court proceedings.
Contact Odtojan Bryl Lawyers if you need legal advice/representation regarding credit-related dispute matters.
For financial institutions to consider pursuing a credit-related debt in court, such as a credit card debt, they must have a credit card contract (a regulated contract) compliant with the requirements under the Credit Laws and must provide a section 88 notice of a default under the terms of the said contract before they file a claim.
If the proceedings go to a final hearing, they must prove the cause of action, the default under the contract.
For more information visit: 'Credit Contract Laws Sydney Australia'
Download the Credit Law Toolkit updated 2018 ==>
Odtojan Bryl Lawyers brings public awareness of a serious issue of great public importance - that our court system is being used as a platform to circumvent the credit laws and obtain judgments without credit contracts hence not proving a cause of action (a default under the contract) which constitutes a fraudulent claim and perversion of the course of justice.
More information will be provided on how OBL principal discovered the systemic breaches of the credit laws by ASX listed company, Credit Corp Services Pty Limited (CCS), and its lawyers such as Carlos Toda and Piper Alderman Lawyers who files/signed a statement of claim pleading a credit card agreement/contract where no such contract exists.
(Sydney Local Court proceedings 2014/00219407 commenced by CCS).
Odtojan Bryl Lawyers have discovered that such conduct by CCS is prolific and systemic and likely spans decades based on the limited publicly available judgment CCS has obtained, where the cause of action (a default/breach under a credit contract) is not proved/determined.
Many claims provided to OBL by those affected by CSS have the same consistent issues reported, CSS refusing/deflecting to provide their pleaded contract under the claim, circumventing the credit laws, and engaging in misleading conduct by referring to non-contractual documents as a credit contract.
Click to Download
PUBLIC NOTICE
Disclaimer: The information provided below is supported by what transpired in the Sydney District Court and NSW Court of Appeal court proceedings; court transcripts, affidavits; representations and documents and legal resources (legislation, rules etc). The notice is subject to change and amendments as more information and documents may be made available.
SUMMARY
1. Odtojan Bryl Lawyers (OBL), Ms Marie Odtojan (Ms Odtojan) and Mr Artem Bryl (Mr Bryl) have been implicated and framed in the NSW Court of Appeal (NSWCOA) leave to appeal judgements of Justices Mark Leeming and Jeremy Kirk (Mr Miles Condon SC case) and John Basten and Richard White (Mr Nicolas Ford and Mr Thomas Glynn case).
2. Ms Odtojan (a party to the proceedings, a victim and witness of the alleged fraud and improprieties of the three respondents below mentioned) and Mr Bryl (witness) has their profession as legal practitioners, and their law firm, OBL, implicated in the NSWCOA published judgments. Their profession threatened and used against them in Ms Odtojan’s personal civil tort-damages proceedings, commenced in Aug-Sept 2022. The cases are as follows:
a. Odtojan v Nicolas George Ford (DC 2022/00242555 ; NSWCOA 2023/131242) - Barrister of Edmund Barton Chambers - See Statement of Claim against Mr Nicolas George Ford of Edmund Barton Chmabers
Legal representatives - Barrister: Mr Bernard Lloyd of of 9 Wentworth Chambers.
Solicitors: Mr Jonathan Newby and Mr John Georgas of Colin Biggers and Paisley.
Mr Ford's Professional Indemnity Insurer was not involved these proceedings.
b. Odtojan v Thomas Patrick Glynn (DC 2022/00273977; NSWCOA 2023/131229) - Principal Solicitor of Glynns Lawyers, based in Tasmania - See Statement of Claim against Mr Thomas Patrick Glynn of Glynns Lawyers
Legal representatives - Barrister: Ms Anne Horvath SC of Banco Chambers.
Solicitors: Ms Elizabeth Lough and Mr Baron Alder of Moray & Agnew (NSWCA LAHearing), and former solicitors: Mr Nicholas Andrew and Ms Belinda Marshall of Barry Nilsson.
Mr Glynn's Professional Indemnity Insurer was not involved these proceedings.
c. Odtojan v Mile Kevin Condon (DC 2022/00273980; NSWCOA 2023/103644) - Senior Counsel of New Chambers - See Statement of Claim against Mr Miles Kevin Condon Senior Counsel of New Chambers
Legal representatives - Barristers: Mr Anthony McInerney SC and Ms Winnie Liu of New Chambers.
Solicitors: Mr James Berg and Sarah Li Yee Lien of DLA Piper, Counsels Mr Anthony McInerney SC and Ms Winnie Liu of New Chambers .
Mr Condon SC's Professional Indemnity Insurer was not involved these proceedings.
3. OBL was never mentioned at the procedural hearings in the District Court and NSWCOA. Neither was Ms Odtojan's profession ventilated and raised as issue, yet OBL, and the profession of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl are recorded in the judgment making adverse comments and criticisms where Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl were never put squarely of the issues for them to answer in court. They were not heard on the matter. Such recordings in the judgments were done by ambush and is against the administration of justice and against judicial ethics and duties.
4. Justices Leeming and Kirk had used their office to search Ms Odtojan's other personal civil cases not related to Condon's case. An unrelated 2019 case was recorded in the judgment, by ambush. the 2019 case is a separate, different case against Credit Corp/Piper Alderman which raised serious issues of Piper Alderman backdating and changing their attendances in the invoices particularly changing Ms Natalie Miller's attendances, amongst many, where they changed the recorded attendance of Ms Miller 'instructing counsel' to 'attending conference' to cover up her conduct of impersonating a legal practitioner and misleading the court in the local court proceedings in 2016 that she was a lawyer. She was referred to as solicitor/instructing solicitor by Mr Sebastian Hartford-Davis when he was aware she was not a solicitor and encouraged her to sit at the bar table despite being an unqualified person. Ms Miller, had also touched and circled evidence and rendered it up a the final hearing before Magistrate Freund. This was by direction of Mr Hartford-Davis (court transcript 18 and 19 July 2016).
SEE THE FULL NOTICE VIA: PUBLIC NOTICE
Contact Us - Form
Complete the form below, and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
